Reply #01
If 86 only means murder, then Merriam-Webster accidentally criminalized half the restaurant industry.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Quote Tweet Kit
Ten replies for X fights.
Fast, sourced, nonviolent lines for the exact argument people are having about 86, 47, and political speech.
Pin this launch post
They're trying to turn 'remove him' into 'kill him.' Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #02
The mainstream definition is the point: throw out, get rid of, refuse service, eject, dismiss, remove.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #03
Political speech does not become a threat because a politician picks the scariest possible reading.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #04
No violence. No threats. No criminalizing dissent. That is the line.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #05
You do not get to rewrite slang in real time and call the dictionary a crime scene.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #06
86 the policy. 86 corruption. 86 bad laws. Everyone knows this means reject or remove.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #07
The burden is on the government to prove a true threat, not on citizens to surrender ordinary slang.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #08
Calling for lawful removal through elections, impeachment, resignation, or defeat is protected political speech.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #09
They are trying to turn 'remove him' into 'kill him' because the actual meaning is inconvenient.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info
Reply #10
If your argument requires pretending '86' has no nonviolent meaning, your argument already lost.
Sign the Project8647 Pledge: https://project8647.info